At the risk of sounding 'Horse Obsessed' (given that 3 out of the last 5 postings have had the word 'horse' somewhere in the title), I must just add one more thought to the current debate on the addition of our favourite non carnivorous mammal to the dining table.
As the Daily Mail splashes pictures of 'cute' looking horses across its front page (with the caption "Bon Appetit: The French see this as food!"), Mail journalists note that, whilst not illegal to sell horsemeat in the UK "there are no restaurants or butchers that do so as there is no demand". "It all sounds very Continental, so brutally French" the paper concludes, so "far removed from anything that would happen in horse-loving
The Mail, and many other papers, reporters and cultural commentators, agree that the consumption of equine quadrupeds is thoroughly Un-British, horse being something that, as one journalist on the
commented, "has traditionally never been eaten in the ".
Well, I hate to disillusion you, dear UK BBC,
but of all meat consumed in
today, horse is probably the most traditional. Britain
Archaeological evidence, painstakingly retrieved from the well-preserved Paleolithic sequence at Boxgrove in West Sussex since the early 1980s, suggests that, around 500,000 years ago, bear, deer, rhinoceros and horse were all preyed upon by our early human ancestors.
One of the most interesting areas examined at Boxgrove (site GTP 17), contained the partially dismembered remains of a horse; evidence for the systematic butchery of the carcass being provided by a detailed examination of the surviving bones, all displaying a variety of cut marks, scrape marks, impact fractures and breakage patterns. Marks preserved across the horse skull further indicated the filleting of muscles, removal of the jaw, and final breaking apart to extract fatty tissue. Additional cut and scrape marks across the pelvis and leg bones indicate dismemberment, filleting and extraction of marrow.
Other bones retrieved from Boxgrove indicate similar deliberate dismemberment of animal carcasses, most notably a horse femur (from area Q1/B) which displayed filleting scrapes, disarticulation marks and impact fractures consistent with the use of a hammerstone and stone anvil to break the bone apart.
No obvious signs of a deliberate and effective hunting strategy have been firmly detected from the site (as yet), though part of a horse shoulder blade (recovered from butchery area GTP 17) possessed a semicircular puncture wound inconsistent with the other impact fractures recorded from the animal carcass. The ‘puncture’ is ambiguous, but it could have been created by a high-speed impact, such as one would expect from penetration by a sharpened wooden spear.
However this particular horse died, it is clear that our ancestors had first access to the body, for signs of carnivore gnawing were always secondary to cut marks produced by flint tools. Also, where individual animal skulls were recovered, the evidence suggests that certain soft body parts, such as the eyes, remained in place at the time of deposition and had not been removed through scavenging activity.
The earliest evidence for food procurement in the British Isles therefore suggests that, contrary to the current belief of the British Press, horse meat was not only top of the ancestral list of edible favourites, but also represents the most traditional meat eaten in the UK, having been a staple for at least half a million years (far, far longer than cow, pig or sheep).
If only someone would let the Daily Mail and BBC know.